A Tale of Humility and Dragons: The Legend of Choryo and KosekikoA Tale of Humility and Dragons: The Legend of Choryo and KosekikoA Tale of Humility and Dragons: The Legend of Choryo and KosekikoA Tale of Humility and Dragons: The Legend of Choryo and KosekikoA Tale of Humility and Dragons: The Legend of Choryo and KosekikoA Tale of Humility and Dragons: The Legend of Choryo and Kosekiko

A Tale of Humility and Dragons: The Legend of Choryo and Kosekiko

Collection Record
School / Tradition—
Historical PeriodEdo Period
Typefuchi-kashira · tosogu
Material—
Analyzing details...

This masterful Edo-period fuchi-kashira set brings a legendary tale of patience, respect, and martial strategy to life!

Provenance & History

The Legend: The fuchi (collar) captures the dramatic moment the hero Choryo (Zhang Liang) wades into churning, perilous waters to offer a retrieved shoe to a dragon. On the kashira (pommel cap), the enigmatic old man Kosekiko (Huang Shigong) is depicted riding above. According to ancient lore, Kosekiko intentionally dropped his shoe into the river to test Choryo’s humility. Because Choryo retrieved it without anger, he was gifted a scroll of supreme military strategy that helped found the Han Dynasty.

Full Description

A Tale of Humility and Dragons: The Legend of Choryo and Kosekiko This masterful Edo-period fuchi-kashira set brings a legendary tale of patience, respect, and martial strategy to life! The Legend: The fuchi (collar) captures the dramatic moment the hero Choryo (Zhang Liang) wades into churning, perilous waters to offer a retrieved shoe to a dragon. On the kashira (pommel cap), the enigmatic old man Kosekiko (Huang Shigong) is depicted riding above. According to ancient lore, Kosekiko intentionally dropped his shoe into the river to test Choryo’s humility. Because Choryo retrieved it without anger, he was gifted a scroll of supreme military strategy that helped found the Han Dynasty. The Craftsmanship: The artisan utilized an elegant oborogin (shibuichi) alloy ground, elevating the dynamic scene with exquisite high-relief carving (takabori) and brilliant gold and mixed-metal inlays (iroe). The deeply sculpted, turbulent waves beautifully frame the intricate, expressive details of the figures and the mystical beast. The Maker: The fuchi is clearly signed 東都於愛宕下 勝政作 (Toto ni oite Atagoshita Katsumasa saku), translating to "Made by Katsumasa below Mt. Atago in the Eastern Capital [Edo]". The Provenance: The exceptional artistry and historical value of this set are officially recognized by an accompanying NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon (Especially Worthy of Preservation) certificate, issued in Showa 54 (1979). A truly museum-quality treasure of samurai metalwork! NBTHK Tokubetsu Kicho Token (Green).

Authentication & Papers
Detail Gallery
Click any image to examine

6 high-resolution detail views — use zoom viewer to inspect hamon, jihada, and metalwork

刀工 — Maker Profile

Katsumasa

勝政
SchoolUnknown
PeriodEdo Period
ProvinceUnknown
Generationnull

The smith **Katsumasa (勝政)** is an undocumented figure within the Edo period record, lacking a verifiable provincial attribution or school lineage in authoritative historical texts. While the name is prominently associated with the 20th-century Seki tradition—specifically the Kojima lineage of Gifu—there is no established record of an Edo-era predecessor of significant standing among the major *Gokaden* schools [[2]](https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/25658-ww2-japanese-sword-identification) [[15]](https://katana-sword.com/products/antique-japanese-katana-sword-signed-kojima-katsumasa-with-iron-landscape-tsuba). Consequently, his artistic motifs and stylistic hallmarks remain undefined, placing him among the obscure *waki-mono* (peripheral) smiths whose works are rarely cataloged by modern scholars or collectors [[1]](https://nihontoclub.com/smiths/KAT75) [[11]](https://tokyo-nihonto.com/pages/swordsmith/katsumasa-kat75?srsltid=AfmBOor0kr0r3ZV3XhLEKNsbn3nGgY4z0Ft8Fzh0jSZsPqnOjf_upDWs). For the serious connoisseur, a blade bearing this signature from the Edo period represents a scholarly enigma that must be evaluated based on its intrinsic metallurgical merits rather than a documented pedigree.